From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sat May 2 15:44:00 2009 X-Authenticated: #3276113 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19cDWYnXlFcCTGjlq2HoY786YdIh1Vbsag1sjJrco +43H4qLoJp6yu5 From: Gerhard Stoll To: MiNT-List Subject: Re: [MiNT] EmuTOS for ColdFire Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 21:41:22 +0200 Message-Id: <3324145282.1572980930@[192.168.178.12]> Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mieze/1.7b8-16012007 Reply-To: gerhard_stoll@gmx.de In-Reply-To: <49FC2D44.5040707@freesbee.fr> References: <68EF70E911F44CB4AC7C90F286219FC1@joevenlt> <49F8D39B.3080303@chello.nl> <3324014950.7760261950@[192.168.178.12]> <20090501111726.70e28da6@phineus> <3324108430.345782912@[192.168.178.12]> <49FC2D44.5040707@freesbee.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.71 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: gerhard_stoll@gmx.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id n42Ji0hY032460 Vincent Rivière wrote: > The ColdFire family must not be seen like the successor of the 680x0 > family, but like some kind of cousin. What I mean is, if a program use the _CPU cookie to test what stackframe the CPU have or some other functions. Is then five ok or not? Have the 68010 a long stackframe or short? Gerhard